I'm not sure how much sleep we got last night, but it wasn't much. The Girlfriend, refusing to let a sleep depervation deprive her of Oregon Coast and it's magistry, still urged for us to continue with her plans. Reluctantly, I agreed.


I spent this weekend with my buddy Rob up in Seattle. While we were out and about we got on the subject of my blog and the shit I do on here. It seemed like just passing conversation, but at some point he asked if it would be cool if once in awhile he wrote a "Special Guest Blog." I said 'yes' and didn't think anything about it after that. Well tonight, I got a voice mail from Rob telling me to check my email. Sure enough, the Born Winner has already completed his first special guest post.
Here you go, it's called: "Why Men Get Married"
My whole life I have always wondered why men get married, and untilI started knocking doors and witnessing the interaction, the decision making process, and lives of the elderly I never understood it.
From my point of view I only saw how the women nagged, withheld sex, begged for children, spent all the money (and if things went really poorly took half the money), and so on. My career has given me a completely different take on the situation. This may seem like a sexist rant so far, but this is actually a cautionary tale for you would never guess it...women.
The advantages for women wanting to get married seemed so obvious to me, but the advantages for the men never quite added up. The way I saw it if you stayed single as a man you could: 1. Keep your money 2. keep your freedom, and 3. pray on the single women desperate to get married, or even better clean up on divorcees (even easier).
Here is where the doom and gloom, and ultimate reason guys get married set in for me. When guys get old they lose it. By lose it I mean they are mindless invalids. When most guys hit 70 two things happen either they die (worst case scenario?) or they lose their mind, forget everything, and need someone to wipe their ass for them. I'm serious most old men can't even remember what they had for breakfast at lunchtime, let alone be responsible for personal hygiene. In the end most marriages end up being some type of lifetime symbiotic relationship.
In the early years/middle ages the husband supports the wife financially and emotionally through pms menopause and all that crazy nonsense, which is what I always saw, but in the end they literally need somebody to keep them alive. They can't cook for themselves, they can't clean for themselves, and they certainly can't take care of themselves in any way shape or form.
So congratulations ladies, that free ride you thought you were picking up wasn't actually free in the end. Enjoy wiping ass and taking care of someone that is completley grumpy and ungrateful, that can't even remember the nice things you did for them yesterday.
Coming from me in my mind this is one of the strongest endorsements of marriage I can give. I always heard marriage was a give and take, and as far as I'm concerned wiping ass is the ultimate take. So congrats ladies enjoy the final years of your life as a caregiver.
The other day I recieved an email from The Elder, one of my best friends and an absolute wizard of instigating sports debates (no joke, if I ever get my own radio show I want him to co-host it. No one gets me focused on tangents better then him). The subject line was simply : "Let the debating Being..." naturally, I was intrigued. The Elders email read like this:
I have put some thought and study into this, and I have composed a list of the greatest sports teams of all time. This is my opinion, and i am curious as to what your thoughts are as well as what your lists would be.
Greatest Sports Teams of All Time:
HONORABLE MENTION:2005 USC Trojans Football Team* 1998 New York Yankees
* - asterix denotes that they did not win a championship that season
I had a number of issues with this email. 1, he put a Hockey team first. Not to mention the 1980 Soviet team was the team that lost to the US in the Lake Placid Miricle game. 2, He put the 01 Lakers on this list ( I don't want to step on the toes of my rebuttle, so just wait for my reasons why). 3, he put the 01 Mariners. The team that was famous for it's out of no where 116 wins, and infamous for choking like David Carradine (I'm sorry, thats not funny. Autoerotic asphyxiation is a serious matter and should be treated as such, haha)
What upset me the most about the 01 Mariners being on the list, was I felt like he was taking a personal dig at me. How could he possibly think this team was better then the 98 Yankees? They only won two less games then the 01 Mariners, but blew through the playoffs and won a World Series. It just did't add up.
Being a Dodgers fan, he wasn't left a bloody mess after the 2001 ALCS like I was. The idea that he deliberatly put the M's on there to piss me off put me in a bad place the rest of the day. Before I replied to this email, I had to have his reasons for including them.
After talking to him, I realized his reasons for putting the M's on there were justified. Wrong, but justified. Armed with the reassurance that this was legit, I fired back my response:
Can they really be "Greatest teams" If they didn't win a championship? I disagree with a few members on your list. Mainly the Soviets and the Mariners ( that was painful. Someone call my doctor, I'm going to have some issues to work through). They didn't win. If any team deserves to be on this list without a championship it's the 07 Pats. Thats it.
The Soviets lost to college kids and amatures. Is the 92 dream team losing to a team made up of college versions of Grant Hill and Chris Webber (actually legend has it is they did beat the 92 team in a scrimmage, but Allen Houston started talking shit, and Michael Jordan made sure Mr. Houston didn't touch the ball the whole next game they played.) Point is, Jordan is not losing to amatures with a medal in his grasp.
Two, my beloved 01' Mariners. They won a major league record 116 games. They were a fun team to watch, and an easy team to root for. But as they proved in October, they were not great. They lost to the Yankees in the ALCS. Here is where it's going to get painful. Those 98 Yankees were the best baseball team I've ever seen. They won their division by 22 games. They won the most games ever at that point with 114, and had a playoff record (including sweeps in the divisional round and the world series) of 11-2. They had young Derek Jeter, a entering his prime Bernie Williams and an All-Star year out of Tino Martinez. They had Pettite, Cone and a overly productive David Wells. The team had NO holes. It's shouldn't be close.
01 Lakers? Why? They won their division by 1 game over the Kings. They didn't win 60 games. They were completely average untill Shaq got his fat ass into gear, and happened to lay waste to the western conference playoffs. That aside, the 96-97 Bulls as well as the 85-86 Celtics both 69 wins and are largely debated as some of the greatest teams ever. Long story short, no team with Shaq's fat ass deserves to be in the top ten sports teams ever.
AND WHERE THE HELL IS THE 72 DOLPHINS! They went undefeated!
That was my response to everything. I obviously had some quams with The Elders list.
Real quick though, lets talk about the 72 Dolphins. True, they were in a less talented league then we currently have, which has been the common response from anyone reading that original email.
"The line men were smaller," "The players were slower," "They played less games," the ney sayers say. While all these are true, only the third I recognize as a valid complaint. The undefeated Dolphins of 1972 are the only undefeated team in any of the four main American Pro Sports history (Those four: Football, Basketball, Baseball and Hockey). They were 17-0 that year (to be perfect in the NFL now you would have to be 19-0). Two extra games means you have two extra chances to spoil perfection. I understand this, and it's a good point. However, there were also less teams meaning the talent wasn't as spread out. For the talent pool available was much more condensed then it would be now.
This brings us to the next two arguments, that there was a lack of athleticism then there is in today sports. There for we shouldn't recognize that team. That maybe so, but that could be said for all sports.
You can't tell me that there is a single team in the NBA right now that would lose to a team in the NBA 30 years ago. Could you imagine a former MVP Dave Cowens trying to guard a guy like Dwight Howard? Cowens was slow and 6'9", yet he was also a 2 time MVP. Dwight Howard can dunk on 12 foot rims. This would not be a game, it would be an execution.
The only sport that can translate is from 30 years ago to today is Baseball. But even then, the old team is battling up hill because of how physically perfect (granted, most artificially) the players are. In 1972, it's not inconcievable to see a player built like me (5'10" 175 lbs). Today, your average player is built like a Florida State line backer.
Example: Ozzie Smith, all star and hall of fame short stop. Played almost 20 years in the MLB. He was listed at 5'11" 150 lbs. Derek Jeter (a player who no one has EVER suggested to have done roids) is listed at 6'3" 195. Both All Stars. Ozzie is in the Hall, Derek is heading there. Here is the catch, Derek is considered to be not a very big dude. Back when Ozzie started out, Derek would be considered a power hitter. Now he is a line drive hitter.
All sports have evolved. Just because a team was perfect in 1972, and not 2010 doesn't mean they weren't perfect. They played the best in the world at that time, and they beat the best in the world at that time. They were great then and they are great now.
Done and done.
So here is my list of the Greatest Teams of All Time: